找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 5356|回复: 2

苏州大学关于78级校友傅苹造假事件的声明

[复制链接]

1

主题

8228

回帖

2万

积分

管理员

积分
27247
发表于 2013-6-11 23:49:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
苏州大学关于78级校友傅苹造假事件的声明
近期,有不少关心我校的海内外校友和朋友给我校来函来电,提及我校中文系78级校友傅苹撰写的回忆录《弯而不折》(Bend, Not Break)中,有多处与当时事实完全不相符合的表述。该书已于20121231日正式出版,因此对我们国家及苏州大学的声誉造成极坏影响,也引起了海内外校友和朋友的极大愤慨。
收到来信来电后,我校立即成立了由相关部门、学院、老师组成的调查小组,对傅苹在校读书期间的学籍档案等进行了认真核查,向傅苹的老师和同班同学进行了了解和访问,得出的基本结论如下:
一.关于傅苹在我校的学习经历。
傅苹,女,1958年生,南京籍高考生,于19789月进入江苏师范学院(苏州大学前身),专业是中国语言文学。1982316办理退学手续,未获毕业证书和学位证书。在读期间,多次无故旷课,违反学校学籍管理规定,影响恶劣,学校曾于198110月给予其行政记过处分。
二.关于傅苹在1978年到1982年四年本科期间修学英语的问题。
傅苹在书中提到,她去美国之前只认识三个英文单词。我们核查后的结果是:197810月—19797月,其英语成绩为“优”,19799月—19807月,其英语成绩为“88”分,两次考试成绩在班内均属中上等水平。英语是学生的必修课。
三.关于傅苹毕业论文的问题。
傅苹于19823月从江苏师范学院退学,所以在毕业生名单中未见其名字,在档案中也未见其毕业论文,也没有她的毕业证书和学位证书。
此外,江苏师范学院中文系毕业论文都是以文学和语言学为研究对象,而不会涉及“杀害女婴”这一涉及社会学的内容。
在其就读期间,78级同学没有任何人涉及刑事事件,其被投入监狱之事更是子虚乌有!其组织社团被逮捕之事也是一派谎言!
四.关于“手指检验”计划生育的问题。
根据苏州大学多位教师(这些教师包括她的同班同学、班主任、中文系领导)证实,学校从未用这种侮辱性的手段对女生进行相关检验,当然更谈不上得到党委领导的支持。傅苹如此编造谎言,是对78级所有同学的侮辱!
根据上述调查结果,我校认为傅苹在书中所写内容严重失实,不仅损害了苏州大学的名誉,也使我们国家形象受到损害,我们将保留追究的权利!
同时,我们也再一次感谢社会各界关心、维护国家形象和苏州大学名誉的有识之士。苏州大学办学113年以来,坚持以人为本,服务社会,30多万毕业生为新中国的建设做出了应有的贡献,其中不乏各行各业的骨干和杰出人才,也有许多毕业生离校后心系母校,感念师恩,以捐资助学、校企合作、联合培养人才等多种形式回报母校培育之恩。苏州大学也不乏留学海外的赤子,他们在异国他乡努力奋斗、成绩斐然,不仅赢得良好的社会地位,也为母校增光添彩。他们异域拼搏之时能常念母校深恩,各尽所能,为母校在学科建设、人才培养、科研创新等方面提供帮助,开拓渠道,诚心切切,不求回报,使母校深感欣慰和骄傲。这些事实又岂是个别别有用心之人能妄言抹杀的?
感谢各位校友和朋友对苏州大学的关注和关心!

苏州大学
2013611


http://www.suda.edu.cn/html/article/17/31716.shtml
回复

使用道具 举报

1

主题

8228

回帖

2万

积分

管理员

积分
27247
 楼主| 发表于 2013-6-17 22:50:44 | 显示全部楼层

苏州大学关于傅苹造假事件的第二份官方声明

自6月11日苏州大学发布关于傅苹的官方声明后,已经引起了各界的广泛关注,许多媒体和广大校友纷纷来电询问学校下一步如何妥善处理此事,多家媒体强烈要求来学校进行专门采访。其实自傅苹造假风波产生以来,我们一直在试图与傅苹本人联系,希望她正视各方提出的合理的批评意见,用适当方式收回她在回忆录中的谎言,还苏州大学及在其书中伤害过的人们一个清白和公正,这也是苏州大学对曾经在校学习过的校友的爱护之意。可是傅苹本人却置之不理,并在后来的演讲和采访中继续说谎,这已经激起了苏州大学校友和在校师生的共愤,激起了许多有良知的中外人士的共愤。在此情形下,苏州大学不得不采取相应措施,发表了第一份官方声明,以正视听。
第一份官方声明发表后,各界反响非常强烈,现在为回应各界要求,同时也考虑到事态紧急,苏州大学现发表第二份官方声明,内容如下:
1、学校本可在第一份官方声明的同时出具相关证据,因涉及傅苹个人在苏州大学的学习和生活记录,暂时不便公开发布,但可以随时接受媒体和有关人士的采访,并在认为有必要时公开发布相关材料。傅苹当时在苏州大学的辅导员老师和有关师生也可以直接接受采访。我们欢迎中外媒体前来苏州大学采访。
2、诚恳希望傅苹能够勇敢地站出来公开应对苏州大学第一份官方声明所列事实,同时公布她宣称所获苏州大学本科和硕士的相关学历和学位证书,如果不肯应对,且无法提供上述文件,那就必须收回自己所说的谎言。
3、苏州大学愿意在有关中外媒体参加,包括她的出版商和关心此事的各方人士均可参加的场合与傅苹进行直接公开对话,以便澄清真相。 希望傅苹能够响应这样的要求,尽快与我们联系确定对话的时间和地点。联系方式为:
Email:szu-whf@suda.edu.cn Tel:0086-512-6522-0971
4、如果傅苹不能够回应苏州大学的上述要求,苏州大学已经在起草律师函件,律师函将直接寄达傅苹本人,要求她对损害苏州大学名誉的行为进行公开道歉和必要的赔偿。同时苏州大学将在中美两国的报纸和网站上发布致傅苹的公开信,要求傅苹撤回自己的谎言并道歉。如果傅苹拒不理睬上述要求,苏州大学将在中国和美国两国对傅苹提起法律诉讼。
5、美国图书馆协会(ALA)2013年年会将于6月29日邀请傅苹在大会上发表演讲并将向全美国12万家公共图书馆推荐那本充满谎言的自传。虽然ALA是可以自由发言和讨论的场所,但决不是可以让谎言作者自由地让谎言变成真理的地方,即使在美国这也是不能允许的。为免毒害美国青年一代和对全世界产生恶劣影响,苏州大学强烈呼吁ALA取消对傅苹的邀请,不予推荐她的书。如若真的发生上述事件,我校将向ALA发出严重抗议,并立刻公布傅苹造假的全部证据。
特此郑重声明,敬请各方关注!
苏州大学  
2013年6月14日
  
The Second Official Statement regarding Ping Fu’s Deceptive Behavior

    Since the release of our First Official Statement dated June 11 regarding Ping Fu’s deceptive statements in her publication about Soochow University, many have expressed interest in, and perhaps concern over, the issue, and some of the media and our alumni have written to enquire about our following moves. A number of individuals from the press have called up for interviews. We must say that, since the incident began, we have been trying to contact Ping Fu (a former undergraduate student who dropped out from our University) to inform her of our hope that she should face up to the criticism from the public, take back her words in her memoir and do justice to all those she has harmed. But Ping Fu has chosen to ignore us while she continues with her deceptive speeches and interviews, much to the indignation of the University’s faculty and students and all related parties at home and abroad. In these circumstances, Soochow University saw it as necessary to clarify our position on the issue.
    The First Official Statement has understandably drawn a lot of public attention worldwide. And to update all parties on our stand on the incident, Soochow University now follows up with its Second Official Statement.
    1.The University could have publicized related evidences in its First Official Statement, but given the fact that many of these evidences involve Ping Fu’s private study and life records at this University, we did not think it was yet time. However, we are willing to show them to the media and/or to other related parties and to make public the evidences when necessary. Ping Fu’s former advisor and fellow classmates at Soochow University are prepared to accept interviews with media both at home and abroad.
    2. Ping Fu should stand up and respond publicly to the facts. She must be honest with the Bachelor’s degree and Master’s credentials that she claimed to have received from Soochow University. The public has every reason to see her failure to respond and to show these documents as proof that she admits to having lied.
    3. In order to clarify matters, Soochow University is prepared for an open dialogue with Ping Fu, that could be attended by the media both at home and abroad as well as her publisher and other related parties. We hope that Ping Fu responds to our suggestion and contact us as soon as possible via: E-mail:szu-hfw@suda.edu.cn, or Tel: 0086-512-6522-0971.
    4. The University holds that Ping Fu must publicly apologize for her lies. If Ping Fu continues to ignore the University’s requests and suggestions that we have so far made, Soochow University will officially start taking legal action (the legal papers in preparation). In the mean time, we will publish an Open Letter on newspapers and through online websites both in China and the USA. Ping Fu must take back her lies and make apologies to the University. If Ping Fu fails to do what is required, Soochow University reserves the right to take legal action against her in both countries.
    5. We are disappointed to know that the American Library Association (ALA)will invite Ping Fu to address its 2013 Annual Conference on June 29 and promote her book to all 120,000 public libraries all over the USA. Although ALA [annual conference] is a platform for free speech and discussions, it absolutely should not be a place to let a liar claim lies as facts, even in the US.We call on the ALA to cancel the invitation and stop promoting her book. Soochow University publicly denounces all arrangements that will involve slanders against us and, in case of a violation, will disclose all evidences of Ping Fu’s fraud.
Soochow University
June 14, 2013

http://www.suda.edu.cn/html/article/17/31740.shtml
回复

使用道具 举报

1

主题

8228

回帖

2万

积分

管理员

积分
27247
 楼主| 发表于 2013-6-17 22:51:21 | 显示全部楼层

关于举行傅苹造假事件媒体集中采访会的公告

苏州大学关于傅苹造假事件的两次声明在网上发布后,引起了国内外有关人士和众多媒体的高度关注,不少媒体来电来函希望能了解傅苹事件的相关情况和采访有关人员。应上述要求,苏州大学将于6月20日(周四)上午10点在苏州大学本部学术报告厅举行有关傅苹事件的媒体集中采访会,欢迎有意采访的媒体前来参加。
请前来参加媒体集中采访会的记者在6月19日(周三)下午14点前与我们取得联系,以便安排有关事宜。经确认的媒体记者将凭记者证和我校颁发的采访证入场参加采访会。
联系方式:苏州大学新闻中心  Email: carol@suda.edu.cn  Tel:+86-512-6750-7845 ;
联系人:丁老师。
苏州大学
2013年6月17日

Announcement of the Joint Media Interview Regarding Ping Fu’s Deceptive Behavior, Soochow University

    Since the release of the two official statements by Soochow University regarding Ping Fu’s deceptive behavior, many have expressed interest in, and perhaps concern over, the issue, and some of the media have written to enquire for further information and called up for interviews. At the request of many media, Soochow University is to hold a joint media interview on Ping Fu’s deceptive behavior in the Academic Hall on the Main Campus at 10:00am on June 20th (Thursday). Those who show interests are welcomed to attend the interview.
    Journalists who intend to attend the interview please contact us before 14:00 on June 19th (Wednesday). Press cards and passes issued by the university are required for entry.
Address for contact: Press Center of Soochow University
Email: carol@suda.edu.cn  Tel: +86-512-6750-7845
Person for Contact: Ms. Ding
Soochow University
June 17th, 2013


http://www.suda.edu.cn/html/article/17/31793.shtml
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

手机版|文革与当代史研究网

GMT+8, 2025-4-21 00:54 , Processed in 0.058695 second(s), 20 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表