找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 1946|回复: 1

新史记译:揭露现代中国黑暗时期的秘密

[复制链接]

1

主题

8228

回帖

2万

积分

管理员

积分
27245
发表于 2019-2-6 18:40:26 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
2016-6-17
《新史记》陈佩榆 译
宋永毅身处研究小组中的最前线,在垃圾场、档案资料库、私人收藏和博客挖掘文档资料。他们接受来访者未公开的情报,花了很多时间去挖掘档案文献,找出个人的受迫害纪录
学生们折磨师长,并将他们殴打致死;工人们把螺丝起子当成尖矛,互相攻击;寺庙和图书馆遭拆毁;数百万人被放逐到农村进行“再教育”。
中国文化大革命带来的动乱与邪恶始於50年前——1966年5月16日,中共中央政治局决定成立中央文革小组,以肃清“反革命修正主义分子”,并创建一个与资本主义老路分道扬镳的新天地。
两个星期过後(编按:1966年6月1日),《人民日报》发布的一篇社论,呼吁群众攻击资产阶级,“横扫一切牛鬼蛇神!”官方报纸如此催促着。
这项号令引发了多年的社会混乱、派系战争,甚至自相残杀。历史学家粗估,总计大约有150万至200万人死亡。
但是,与曾铸下大灾难的斯大林、波尔布特(Pol Pot)、佛朗哥(Franco)和希特勒不同,这个主导文化大革命的政权至今依旧在位。文革50周年纪念几乎没有公开讨论,中国共产党封锁了大部分历史,希望隐瞒其精神遗产中的缺陷。“研究人员不能接受任何关於文革的采访。”本周末(2016年5月15日)一名中国学者这麽说。
这对於记录文化大革命构成了特别的挑战──这也是为什么,16年前——2000年——寄给宋永毅的包裹(里面包含1960年代末期天津市的机密军事计画),是如此地非同寻常。
当时,出生於中国、在美国宾州狄金森学院(Dickinson College)图书馆任职的宋永毅教授,几个月前才被其母国释放,他因被指控“走私秘密文件”而遭当局拘押。他一直致力於蒐集文革的材料,为了红卫兵小报,遍寻许多档案馆与跳蚤市场。他希望汇编所有被用来煽动混乱的宣传记录,在某些地方,这类文革记录反映出人类与动物之间只有模糊的界线。
遭中共当局拘押的这段时间,看起来似乎将永久终结宋永毅在这方面的努力,但相反地,这段时间却树立起他的全球形象:有个人决心揭露现代中国黑暗时期的秘密之一。

宋永毅
一名中国高中教师寄给宋永毅的包裹,成为他在後续几年获取诸多资料中的第一份,他身处研究小组中的最前线,在垃圾场、档案资料库、私人收藏和博客挖掘文档资料。他们接受未公开来访者的情报,花了很多时间去挖掘档案文献,然後找出个人的受迫害纪录。
在此过程中,他们让令人瞠目结舌的历史重见天日,详尽说明了文革期间发生哪些事情;当时毛泽东颠覆了正常的社会秩序,策划目无法纪的群众暴动,随处可见工厂工人关押主管,学生用沸腾的开水浇身、以铁钉刺入指甲等等方式,来折磨师长。
宋教授非凡成就的一部分於2016年6月问世:以电子书的形式出版广西文革机密档案36卷。
在其13000页里面,最令人震惊的真相莫过於人吃人的档案。时代的混乱让人类变得残暴,红卫兵(透过暴力的阶级斗争清除敌人的青年团体)和其他人尽情食用被视为“阶级敌人”的心脏、肝脏、阴茎和乳房。宋教授表示,总计全区至少波及31个县421人被吃掉。“偏僻的乡村出现了人吃人的群众运动。”只有现在,文化大革命发动後经过50年,那段时期的文献档案才汇整成任何人都可以阅读的形式,宋教授花了六年的努力。他保护这些资料的提供者、档案管理员、收藏家和希望揭开真相而偷运文件的高级官员。
这份报告(编按:指《广西文革机密档案资料》)成为“今日文化大革命现存记载中最重要的情报”,熊景明(Jean Hung)说。1988年至2007年期间,她在香港中文大学的中国服务研究中心管理馆藏资料。

《广西文革机密档案资料》电子书多达36卷。
如果现代中国一直设法封锁历史,那么,它早已失败了。研究苏联时代的学者举例说明,“苏联从未像中国那样公开其黑暗的历史过去,”魏昂德(Andrew Walder)如此说;他是斯坦福大学政治社会学家,曾撰写大量关於毛泽东时代的文章。也就是说,部分原因是中国共产党自己的努力,在内部纪录了毛泽东犯下的可怕事情。
很少文献资料像广西档案那样系统地陈述历史,这是北京内部改革派分子於1980年代汇编而成的,“(他们)希望看到像文化大革命这样的事件、这些可怕的事情,能获得调查。”目前任职於加州大学洛杉矶分校图书馆的宋教授说。
那些文献编列了“谁被吃掉、谁被谁吃掉、以及原因”,宋教授表示,“我认为他们想让文革期间的广西真相曝光。”
然而,更多的资讯仍然深锁在中国的资料库里,由一党制国家汇编的资料是“为了梳理出每件事与每个人的情报——但它们也很明显地,企图保住所有的秘密。”冯客(Frank Dikotter)说。冯客是香港大学的历史学家,曾撰写《文化大革命:人民的历史》(The Cultural Revolution: A People’s History)。
为了其着作的研究,冯客花了6个月的时间在中国资料库(编按:档案馆)阅读史料。有些人不让他进去,或者端茶送他离开,不过,其他人提供给他的资料则有助於针对史实抽丝剥茧。
即使是一般的经济报告,也能透露出1966年发动的混乱规模有多大,当崇拜毛泽东的热潮快速增长时,人们开始互相攻击和杀害,努力消灭“走资派”。几乎各行各业的人都在一夜之间丢下了工作,包含花店、水果经销商、殡仪业者和裁缝。
玩具制造商减少了输出,但对塑胶的需求反而提高,这是因为要制作红宝书的塑料封皮。工厂一个月内生产出5000万个毛泽东的纪念章,却仍赶不上人人要求佩戴最高领袖头像的异常需求。制作那些纪念章消耗了大量的铝,迫使毛泽东本人不得不介入,1969年他要求“还我飞机”。
其他资料中则详述了蒙古族在内蒙所遭遇的恐怖待遇。“舌头被撕下、用钳子拔除牙齿、眼睛从眼窝里被挖了出来,热铁就烙印在人肉上头。”冯客教授写道。
在另一个省份,将近20%的人口被指控从事“犯罪”活动。“这些罪名范围,从不小心戳破有毛泽东画像的海报,到在黑市购买一颗鸡蛋。”他说。随着资金被转移到文化大革命的活动里,国家卫生部转向服务领导者而非人民,致使脑膜炎疫情爆发而失去控制,大约16万人死亡。
同时,在北京,学生们於在对“资本主义知识分子”的批斗中杀害了数十名教师,将近1%的老师自杀身亡。有人使用剪刀割破了人的喉咙,另一人则是用他的眼镜;也有人被浸到专门用来张贴揭批敌人“大字报”的胶水桶里,另一个拿着锤子敲打他的头部……这些死亡的细节,源自王友琴的广泛搜查,她是芝加哥大学中文课程主任,曾在中国文革受难者纪念园(Chinese Holocaust Memorial)网站上整理这些资料。
另外两个庞大的线上文革资料库也已建成:一个是涵盖约四万笔文献的互联网数据库,由宋教授协助创建,另一个网站则是多伦多大学研究员吴一庆经营,里面超过一万笔资料与文章。很多是吴教授从线上贴文蒐集来的个人故事,以避免受到中国的审查。
这些数量庞大的可用文献,证明了那些致力揭开真相者的冰雪聪明。
但,尽管如此,在中国内部,很少人愿意书写关於文化大革命的事情,因为他们知道这些文章不会被刊出;在中国海外,研究这段时期的人员也大概用两只手就可以数完。很少人真正理解这些已汇编的文献。
“我们确实拥有大量的资料。但这并不代表我们知道或是了解。”吴教授说,他着有《边缘的文化革命:中国社会主义的危机》(Cultural Revolution at the Margins: Chinese Socialism in Crisis)一书。
熊女士拿文革与纳粹大屠杀比较,这是所有图书馆的主题。文化大革命的死亡人数或许比纳粹德国少,但伤害人数可能超过。
“这真的是个悲惨的情境,”她说,“文化大革命,我的天啊,历时将近10年,……其影响如此巨大、无可匹比,几乎每个家庭都受到了冲击。”
(加拿大《环球邮报》(The Globe and Mail),纳森·范德克里普Nathan VanderKlippe。译文由《新史记》刊出)


https://hqsbnet.wordpress.com/2016/06/18/%E6%8F%AD%E9%9C%B2%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E9%BB%91%E6%9A%97%E6%97%B6%E6%9C%9F%E7%9A%84%E7%A7%98%E5%AF%86%E6%96%B0%E5%8F%B2%E8%AE%B0/
回复

使用道具 举报

1

主题

8228

回帖

2万

积分

管理员

积分
27245
 楼主| 发表于 2019-2-6 18:42:58 | 显示全部楼层

原文

Suppressed records revealed 50 years after China’s Cultural Revolution




Members of the Red Guards, high school and university students, waving copies of Chairman Mao Zedong's "Little Red Book" as they parade in Beijing's streets at the beginning of the "Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution". Launched by Mao in 1966 to topple his political enemies after the failure of the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution saw a decade of violence and destruction nationwide as party-led class conflict devolved into social chaos.


JEAN VINCENT/AFP/GETTY IMAGES



NATHAN VANDERKLIPPE ASIA CORRESPONDENT
BEIJING
PUBLISHED MAY 15, 2016
UPDATED MAY 16, 2018
0 评论
Students tortured teachers and beat them to death. Workers attacked one another with screwdrivers devised into spears. Temples and libraries were razed. Millions of people were banished to the countryside for "re-education."


The turbulence and viciousness of China's Cultural Revolution began 50 years ago, on May 16, 1966, with a Politburo decision to create a Cultural Revolution Group that would oppose "counter-revolutionary revisionists" and create a final rupture with the old ways of the capitalist past.


Two weeks later, a People's Daily editorial called for an attack on the bourgeoisie. "Sweep away all monsters and demons!" the state newspaper urged.


The directive launched years of social disorder, factional warfare and even cannibalism. In total, between 1.5 million and two million people died, historians estimate.


But unlike the calamities perpetrated by Stalin, Pol Pot, Franco and Hitler, the regime responsible for the Cultural Revolution remains in power. The 50th anniversary will barely be discussed in public. The Communist Party has largely maintained a historical blackout, in hopes of suppressing the blemish on its legacy. "Researchers cannot accept any interviews related to the Cultural Revolution," one Chinese academic said this weekend.


That has presented a unique challenge to those documenting the Cultural Revolution – which is why the package sent to Song Yongyi 16 years ago, containing classified military plans in the city of Tianjin in the late 1960s, was so exceptional.


A Chinese-born librarian at Dickinson College in Pennsylvania, Prof. Song had only months before been released from his home country, where authorities had detained him on suspicion of smuggling secret documents. He had been on a quest to collect material on the Cultural Revolution, scouring archives and flea markets for copies of Red Guard newspapers. He wanted to compile a full record of the propaganda used to stoke tumult that, in some places, rendered indistinct the line between human and animal.


His time in detention looked like it would permanently end that quest. Instead, it gave him a global profile as someone determined to reveal the secrets of one of modern China's darkest hours.


The package that he received from a Chinese high school teacher became the first of many he would acquire in the years that followed, placing him at the forefront of a small band of researchers who have dug for documents in garbage dumps, archives, private collections and blogs. They have accepted information from unannounced visitors, spent long hours digging through archival documents and sought out personal accounts of hardship.


In the process, they have brought to light a stunningly detailed account of what happened during the Cultural Revolution, when Mao Zedong subverted normal societal order, orchestrating a mass lawlessness that saw factory workers imprison bosses and students torture teachers with boiling water and nail-spiked clubs.


One of Prof. Song's signal achievements will emerge next month, when he begins the republication, in e-book form, of a 36-volume secret report on the Cultural Revolution in the country's southern Guangxi province.


Among the most startling revelations in its 13,000 pages is the cannibalism it documents. Whipped into a fury by the chaos of the times, Red Guards – groups of youth dedicated to removing enemies through violent class struggle – and others feasted on the hearts, livers, penises and breasts of people deemed "class enemies." In total, 421 were eaten in at least 31 provincial counties, Prof. Song said.


"So there was a cannibalism mass movement in the remote countryside."


Only now, 50 years after the beginning of the Cultural Revolution, has the account of that period been assembled in a form that anyone can read. It took six years of effort by Prof. Song to secure each volume from a network of archivists, collectors and high-ranking Chinese officials who smuggled out documents in hopes of exposing the truth.


The report forms "the most important information on the Cultural Revolution that exists today," said Jean Hung, who from 1988 to 2007 oversaw collection development at the Universities Service Centre of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.


If modern China has sought to suppress history, then, it has failed. Academics who study Soviet times, as one example, "tell me that the USSR was never so open about their dark historical past as China has been," said Andrew Walder, a Stanford political sociologist who has written extensively on the Mao era. That is, in part, due to efforts by elements inside China's Communist Party itself to internally document the ugliness Mao perpetrated.


Few documents exemplify that like the Guangxi report, which was compiled in the 1980s at the direction of reformist elements inside Beijing who "wanted to see matters like the Cultural Revolution, these horrible things, get investigated," said Prof. Song, who is now a librarian at UCLA.


The documents list "who was eaten. Who was eaten by who. The reason," Prof. Song said. "My view is they expose the truth of Guangxi during the Cultural Revolution."


Far more information, however, remains locked away in Chinese archives, compiled by a one-party state with a "desire to tease out information about everything and everybody – and an attempt also, clearly, to keep all of this secret," said Frank Dikotter, a historian at the University of Hong Kong who wrote The Cultural Revolution: A People's History.


To research his book, Prof. Dikotter spent six months in Chinese archives. Some wouldn't let him in, or served tea before sending him on his way. Others, however, provided him documents that helped to peel back time.


Even mundane economic reports revealed the scale of dislocation beginning in 1966, as reverence for Mao grew feverish while people attacked and killed each other in efforts to wipe out "capitalist roaders." Entire categories of people lost work overnight, including florists, fruit sellers, undertakers and dressmakers.


Toymakers curbed output as plastic became needed, instead, to make glossy covers for the Little Red Book. Factories churned out 50 million Mao badges a month, but still struggled to keep up with extraordinary demand for wearable images of the leader. So much aluminum was diverted to those badges that by 1969 Mao himself had to step in, demanding "give me back my airplanes."


Other documents detailed the chilling treatment of ethnic Mongolians in Inner Mongolia. "Tongues were ripped out, teeth extracted with pliers, eyes gouged from their sockets, flesh branded with hot irons," Prof. Dikotter wrote.


In another province, one in 50 people was accused of engaging in crime. "These crimes range from poking a hole inadvertently in a Mao poster to buying an egg on the black market," he said. With money diverted to Cultural Revolution efforts, and the country's health ministry attacked for serving leaders rather than the people, a meningitis outbreak spiralled out of control. Some 160,000 people died.


In Beijing, meanwhile, students killed dozens of teachers in a battle against "capitalist intellectuals." Roughly one in 100 teachers died by suicide. One used scissors to cut his throat; another used his glasses. One leapt into a vat of glue used to post "big character posters" that denounced adversaries. Another hit his head with a hammer. Details of their deaths emerged from extensive research by Youqin Wang, the Chinese language program director at the University of Chicago, who has compiled them on a website called the Chinese Holocaust Memorial.


Two other massive online Cultural Revolution repositories have also been built: an Internet-connected database of roughly 40,000 documents that Prof. Song helped to create, and another website run by University of Toronto researcher Yiching Wu that contains more than 10,000 texts and articles. Many of them are personal stories collected from online posts by Prof. Wu who preserves them from censorship in China.


The sheer volume of available documents stands as a testament to the ingenuity of those dedicated to revealing what happened.


Still, where the Chinese Communist Party has been unable to block preservation efforts it has succeeded in halting discussion. Inside China, few are willing to write on the Cultural Revolution, knowing their work won't be published. Outside China, the number of researchers working on the period can be mostly counted on two hands. Few people are actually reading the documents that have been compiled.


"We do have lots of information. But that doesn't mean we know or understand," said Prof. Wu, who wrote The Cultural Revolution at the Margins: Chinese Socialism in Crisis.


Ms. Hung compares that to the Holocaust, which is the subject of entire libraries. The Cultural Revolution may have killed fewer people than Nazi Germany. But it scarred many more.


"This is really a pathetic situation," she said. "The Cultural Revolution, my goodness, lasted for 10 years. …The impact is immense, it's incomparable. Almost every single family was impacted."


https://www.theglobeandmail.com/ ... on/article30028854/
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

手机版|文革与当代史研究网

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 17:18 , Processed in 0.025785 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表